Research Article

JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN ELECTION PETITIONS AND DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA

1 Department of Legislative Support Services (Bills and Legislative Drafting Division), National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies, Abuja-Nigeria
2 Principal Partner, Coakes (Coakes & Partners), Legal Practitioners
* Corresponding author: smnibrahim2@gmail.com
Published: May, 2024
Pages: 1-23

Abstract

This paper analyzes the complex relationship between judicial review and democracy, examining the approaches of the USA, UK, and Kenya. It examines how varying levels of judicial activism shape this balance, highlighting the potential for judicial intervention to undermine or protect democratic principles and rights. While the judiciary's role in interpreting the law is essential, it can also lead to accusations of "judicial intrusion" in democratic processes. This paper contrasts judicial review systems across the three countries, illuminating unique challenges in each context. This paper advocates for a comprehensive review of judicial review laws through doctrinal research, including case studies and qualitative analysis. The goal is clearly reviewing the scope of judicial power in a democracy.
How to Cite

Ibrahim, U., Yahya, S., & oke, I. (2024). JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN ELECTION PETITIONS AND DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA. ABU Law Journal, 42(1), 1-23.

U. Ibrahim, S. Yahya, and I. oke, "JUDICIAL INTERVENTION IN ELECTION PETITIONS AND DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA," ABU Law Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1-23, May 2024.

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn