COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RULES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS UNDER ENGLISH AND ISLAMIC LAWS
1 Department of Islamic Law, Faculty of Law,Bauchi State University, Gadau
2 Shariah Court of Appeal, Jos, Plateau State
* Corresponding author: muhammadsalisuisa@abulj.org.ng
2 Shariah Court of Appeal, Jos, Plateau State
* Corresponding author: muhammadsalisuisa@abulj.org.ng
Abstract
With the collapse of many organizations, many researchers are increasingly paying attention to professional ethics. But ethical issues are not always clear-cut; there are many grey areas that need to be threaded with care by professional bodies. To determine whether an action or decision is ethically carried out, ethical theories, developed mainly by Western scholars, are the current theoretical framework organizations have at their disposal. Theories such as relativism, utilitarianism, the divine command theory, and the virtues ethics are all products of Western understanding of what ethics are and how they are applicable to help one’s decision making process. Despite their utility, this paper intends to argue that the Western concepts and understanding of what ethics are are limited and incomprehensive in explaining what is right and what is wrong. In its place, this paper argues that to understand the concepts of ethics, one can extend beyond time and space. It has to be analyzed from an Islamic perspective. Towards this purpose, this paper will compare and contrast between Islamic and Western perspectives of ethics and highlight the main weaknesses and limitations of the former. Then, an argument on why Islam can provide the best understanding of ethics will be made.
Keywords
Ethics
Islamic Law
Lawyers
How to Cite
Isa, M. S., & Kanam, Y. M. (2023). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RULES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS UNDER ENGLISH AND ISLAMIC LAWS. ABU Law Journal, 40(1), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.67203/abulj.2023.yoe86vu0
M. S. Isa, and Y. M. Kanam, "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RULES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS UNDER ENGLISH AND ISLAMIC LAWS," ABU Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 205-220, June 2023. doi: 10.67203/abulj.2023.yoe86vu0